Case CCT 29/18

Case CCT 29/18

Case CCT 29/18

In the matter between:
KARIN STEENKAMP: First Applicants
FURTHER 1817 APPLICANTS: 2nd to 1818th Applicants
and
EDCON LIMITED: Respondent

Neutral citation: Steenkamp v Edcon Limited [2019] ZACC 17
Coram: Mogoeng CJ, Basson AJ, Cameron J, Dlodlo AJ, Froneman J, Goliath AJ, Khampepe J, Mhlantla J, Petse AJ and Theron J
Judgment: Basson AJ (unanimous)
Heard on: 14 November 2018
Decided on: 30 April 2019
Summary: Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 — dismissal for operational requirements — application in terms of section 189A(13) brought outside of time limits — condonation refused — failed legal strategy alone not sufficient to show good cause — labour matters are expeditious in nature — section 189A(13)(d) compensation remedy not a stand-alone remedy and dependent on the inappropriateness of remedies (a)-(c).

Download The Full Document

2019-08-27T13:15:02+00:00